Terrorizing its own population should not be the way to reach a favorable option for Yerevan: Key points of Zakharova’s statements
Stoltenberg’s “voyage” was another attempt to bring the countries of the South Caucasus into the Euro-Atlantic sphere of influence.
NATO’s efforts are aimed at discrediting the relations between Yerevan and Moscow, as well as at the complete suspension of contacts.
Azerbaijan has a negative attitude toward the EU observation mission, and giving the EU such a mandate was the unilateral decision of Yerevan.
Terrorizing its own population is hardly the best way to reach a favorable option for Yerevan.
What the Armenian prime minister said about the threat of war should in no way be associated with Russia; it is exclusively the decision of the country’s leadership following its contacts with the West. I want only those who make decisions in Yerevan to be held responsible for all their steps taken under the influence of the West. We have expressed this, including through bilateral channels.
The information about the termination of service of the Mir card payment system in Armenia requires additional clarification; we are dealing with that issue.
We remember the slogans that the current authorities of Armenia used when coming to power: complete sincerity and freedom of speech. I don’t want to think that they will resort to disallowing or censoring Russian TV channels in Armenia.
